The College Fix

Yale University counselors are testing a ‘racially informed’ approach when treating kids for mental health problems

Yale University clinicians will begin asking pediatric mental health patients about their experiences with racism.

The Yale Child Study Center will use an “innovative clinical tool” called the “Racially Informed Clinical Formulation” to “address the pervasive impact of racism on mental health.”

The study center “serves as the Department of Child Psychiatry for the Yale School of Medicine,” according to its website.

The tool “involves a strategic effort to systematically integrate patients’ racial identities and experiences into clinical assessments and treatment plans,” according to a university news release.

The “clinical framework” “enhances mental health care,” according to the news release.

The approach includes discussing the child’s “racial and ethnic experiences.” However, the healthcare provider will also discuss his “own clinician’s own racial and ethnic identities and biases.”

Cecilia Frometa, a clinical psychologist, is overseeing the use of this method. She initially expressed interest in answering questions but has yet to respond to The College Fix with further comments. The Fix asked for the motivation behind the new method, how it was developed, and what will happen to the “racially informed” approach if it does not work.

Frometa said she would follow up the week of Sep. 30 after meeting with her team to discuss other questions received. She has not responded further, including to a reminder sent in the last week.

She has previously helped “create a health equity plan” for the child study center, according to a 2022 news release that celebrated the clinic’s DEI efforts.

‘Discriminatory’ ‘apartheid medicine’

However, a medical reform group that combats “the attack on our healthcare system from woke activists,” criticized Yale’s plans.

The new approach is “discriminatory,” according to Do No Harm, “in the sense that it’s low-quality care for patients from certain racial or ethnic groups.”

It is also a “terrible idea” since it involves “interrogating children” about racism,” Director of Research Ian Kingsbury said via a media statement.

“As is often the case, the DEI agenda takes the greatest toll on the people it claims to protect,” Kingsbury said.

Do No Harm has previously conducted a study which questioned the idea of “racial concordance.” This idea holds that racial minority patients are best served by doctors of the same race, though the medical reform group says the evidence in support of this theory is minimal and “outweighed” by research finding the opposite.

“Apartheid medicine has been rapidly mainstreamed by nonsense claims that patients benefit from racially concordant care,” Kingsbury said.

“In all likelihood, most of these kids have had limited encounters with racism. But the power of suggestion is potent in young kids,” the research director said. “This approach will inevitably steer these kids to believe that racism is a major force in their lives.”

The group also said “rigor” and “science” are “disappearing” when “race in medicine” is studied.

“It’s likely that any evaluation of its effectiveness would be carried out with sloppy methodology and a predetermined result,” Kingsbury said.

Psychiatric groups have previously pushed for incorporating “structural racism” into mental health care and asking patients about their experiences with race.

The American Psychiatric Association says clinicians should give “patients the space to candidly express emotional responses to racism and investigate symptoms of internalized racism.”

They can also help “young people with coping strategies to deal with discrimination and microaggressions.”

MORE: Neuroscientists blame racism for black women aging faster

IMAGE: Media_Photos/Shutterstock

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter