Today’s New York Times features a debate on the merits of Harvard and M.I.T. offering online courses free of charge but without credit. Richard Vedder, an economics professor at Ohio University and director of the Center for College Affordability and Productivity, praised the idea:
Previous university efforts have floundered because of the anti-innovation culture of higher education, especially manifested in faculty resistance. However, these new courses are free, and grades and “certificates” are granted. There are two obstacles, however, limiting the potential success of these ventures. First, students and employers want “diplomas” (skill certification), which random certificates for individual courses probably will not meet. Second, for large numbers, college is as much a socialization and networking as an intellectual exercise, and such accoutrements of college life as booze and sex are hard to provide online.
Nonetheless, this has great promise, leading to lower cost quality higher education by sidestepping the three greatest enemies to achieving that objective: the federal government (through their perverse financial incentives via dysfunctional student aid programs and myriad regulatory obstacles), the accreditation agencies (with their barriers to entry), and the faculty of traditional colleges. These providers, whose students are not dependent on federal financial aid, can just say no to traditional accreditation and start their own accrediting agency or rely on others (i.e., Underwriters Laboratories, Educational Testing Service, ACT) to bundle together courses to provide degrees. Necessity is the mother of invention.
Click here to Like The College Fix on Facebook.
Please join the conversation about our stories on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, MeWe, Rumble, Gab, Minds and Gettr.